I will try to be brief. But this story—or “God stamp” actually—was a long time in the making.
It started shortly after Dana and I began the fight against
her recurrent breast cancer which was diagnosed in August 2006. The story
became an official “God stamp” just this past fall, six years later. (For
backstory on "God stamps," you may want to click to this post, or search for "deer" or
"rainbow" on this blog.)
In the second year of battling recurrence, it became clear
that this round of breast cancer was not going away easily, if at all. As we
settled into the slog, Dana began reading a book by John Eldredge with her good
friend Kay. Eldredge is a writer, teacher, counselor who touches a great deal
on what some might call the “chick-if-i-cation” of the church—asking men,
who are of the hunter/gatherer nature, to share emotions and sing, etc., things
guys are not inclined to do, unless they are talking about football or cheering
with 50,000 other fans.
In this particular book (I am still searching for the exact
book, Eldredge, a prolific writer, has written many) Eldredge told a story
about taking his son elk hunting. In recounting the story, he told of what a
great father/son bonding time he had envisioned for this particular experience.
But as the hunting excursion wore on, they hadn’t seen one elk. So Eldridge
began to pray. He prayed that they might run across an elk, justifying the
request by reminding God of the terrific bonding experience it would be. And,
lo and behold, near the end of the hunting day, an elk sauntered across their
path. Boom. His son got his elk. Eldridge, then, went on to use that story as
an illustration for prayer.
This caused Dana to respond in an email to Kay: Oh that’s just great. I am praying against
cancer, in hopes of living, and I am getting nothing. He prays for an elk, in
hopes to kill it, and God comes through for him.
To which Kay responded, in her usual poignant way: Dana, you have elk envy. Don’t have elk
envy. Just because God answers prayer one way doesn’t mean He is going to
answer your prayer the same way.
Which is true. Very true. Undeniably, biblically, and
theologically true.
So, “no elk envy” became one of our bumper sticker phrases
(Kay actually needle-pointed the phrase, and a facsimile of an elk, into a
pillow case) throughout the cancer fight, and as best we could, we made it the
framework for our praying.
In the fall of 2009 the battle took a hard turn. The cancer
spread in a way that affected Dana’s cognitive and motor capabilities. So, not
only did she transition into a bedridden condition, but in what was probably
the cruelest turn in the fight, Dana lost her ability to communicate, or more
specifically, to express. Her communication was simply “yes” or “no” responses
to questions and occasionally she phrased a sentence or two.
Here’s why it was cruel. Our ability to communicate and
express is what attracted us to each other in the first place, and it’s what
eventually placed us into what we called “one of the top five loves of all
time.” We loved making each other laugh. We loved sharing and processing
together. Dana was invigorated by the art of writing and expressing. It was in
the DNA of her personality. And now, as we were moving into the most
challenging era of our marriage, we were doing it with one-word answers to
life’s most difficult questions and high-stakes dilemmas.
While we were in, what I’ve labeled, “hospice mode,” Dana
and I would touch on the subject of heaven, but she was not comfortable in
making that a topic of conversation. We had long said that if one of us got to
heaven before the other, then heaven was not going to be all it was cracked up
to be. And we’d both said, in our more expressive moments, that neither of us
will give the other permission to “go.” We would both be hanging onto the leg
of the other.
Knowing Dana was not comfortable with the subject of heaven,
I concluded, whether rightly or wrongly, that talking about heaven might
create more fear and anxiety than comfort and assurance—pulling together info
from our conversations from our expressive days and mixing that with Dana’s
one-word answers to my questions about the subject. Yet, here we are,
approaching our ultimate goodbye and Dana’s big hello, with scant ability to
communicate.
And so, you plow through on your own, navigating the
high-wire balancing act that care-giving forces upon you: protection vs.
reality; the presence of hospice and palliative care vs. the appearance of
throwing in the towel; the desire, and need, to enter into end of life
conversation vs. creating fear.
It’s an impossible balance, and you do the best you can.
During hospice mode those were the tensions occupying my
mind which was in a constant state of whirring and spinning, like the whirring
and spinning you hear in your computer from time to time. Only my whirring and
spinning never wound down. There was no CTL+ALT+DEL keyboard sequence.
That November our friends Randy and Kay came to visit from
Montana. Yes, the Kay with whom Dana shared the John Eldredge book, which by
now had been two years prior. Dana knew they were coming. As soon as they
walked through the door, before anything else was said, Dana piped up, “No elk
envy.”
I am not sure there has ever been a better placed, better
prepared phrase in all of history. If you’ve ever read John Steinbeck’s East of Eden, it was a “timshel” moment.
For in that phrase, Dana told all of us that she knew the seriousness of the
situation. And perhaps most importantly, she told us all, especially me, that
she was okay with that.
In that phrase she showed humor, expression, connection. I
laughed. I cried. But mostly, I sighed heavily—a deep-body sigh. It’s not that
it made anything easier, but I was able to feel, ever so slightly, that we were
in this thing together. It was a boost I needed as we navigated the final days,
which, it turned out, would be just around the corner from Randy and Kay’s
visit.
But here is where the story takes a turn toward God-stamp
status. Last November, Randy took their 12-year old son Ben elk hunting for the
first time on the ranch where they live in Montana. I know. Elk hunting. Father and son. It was the
first season that Ben was age eligible to hunt elk. They saw a few elk
throughout the day but never had a clear shot. Then, by late afternoon they
tried one more area. Three elk finally walked out into the open. Ben set up and
took one shot. Boom. Ben got his elk. Randy would later note, being a fittingly
proud dad, it was a “perfect lung shot.”
And we all knew this was more than Ben’s first elk.
It was a near-perfect repeat of the scenario that generated
our prayer chant “no elk envy”—a father-son elk hunting excursion.
Extraordinarily, Ben saw and killed an elk at pretty much the earliest possible
moment—the first shot he took on the first day he hunted of the first year he
was eligible to hunt.
I don’t know if there’s much theological backing for this
(and it’s not the first time I’ve pushed through the limits of theology in this
whole journey), but I have taken this as a divine imprimatur—a God stamp—on a
couple levels: number one, that yes, indeed, Dana’s declaration of “no elk
envy” on Randy and Kay’s visit stands as a window into her thinking that she
knew how bad things were, and she was okay with that. Secondly, and more importantly,
our prayers are to have the flavor of “no elk envy.”
That’s huge. And it goes against our nature.
Just because God does not move or answer prayers the way we
want or hope or expect doesn’t mean that God is any less good than when He does
answer prayers the way we want or hope or expect. This, though, is a tough nut
to crack. Just look at the prayer request lists of any church. First, our
requests take on the flavor of a Christmas list, stating things that we want.
Then, when things do turn out the way we want, we heap on the praise (“God is
good!” we will say). When they don’t, the flavor is a little different (“Keep
praying!” we will say).
Why is this? Do we oversell how God will intervene in our
lives thus creating an expectation God never expected us to have? The only
fail-safe promise we have from God is that He will be with us. But, because of
expectations we’ve created, we’ve worked ourselves into a corner where God’s
presence doesn’t really matter—we would rather have our way than His presence.
When I look at how Jesus taught us to pray (Matthew 6 and
Luke 11), I can only find two personal items we can expect from God based on
our requests: 1.) our daily sustenance; 2.) to be lead away from temptation.
So how is it that we are brazenly disappointed when things
don’t go our way? Maybe it’s because we see in the gospels people asking for
healing and Jesus heals them, so we think we should get the same treatment. But
isn’t this classic “elk envy”? To quote our friend Kay: Just because Jesus
answered one prayer one way doesn’t mean He will answer our prayers the same
way.
Curiously, when I started writing this blog post—a post on the subject of our desires versus God’s ways—while in
California with Jessica and her family, I received news that my mom was rushed to the hospital with
chest pains—a first for her. Of course, I prayed like crazy for my own desires
and wishes—that everything would be okay—and gave a patronizing nod to “God’s
ways.”
Nice test, God.
Isn’t that just like Him? I knew that writing about prayer
was likely to bring on a test, but I didn’t think it would come so quickly. For
the record, mom did not appear to have a heart attack (God is good!) and will
undergo some follow up tests this week (Please keep praying!).
The timing of Mom’s hospital run feels like a gentle nudge
from God that says: Make sure you’re not giving the impression to not pray like
crazy for desires and wishes (especially since we see a fair amount of
Scripture telling us to do just that). I guess though, that the point where we
get off track is the expectation we place on the results. Scripture does tell
us to bring our desires and requests to God, but the healthy attitude seems to
ask that we not base our opinion of God on how He honors our desires and
requests. If things do not go as we hoped, we will naturally be mad, sad, hurt,
disappointed and myriad other emotions. I think this is healthy. Where it gets
less healthy, or even unhealthy, is when these emotions morph into mindsets of
bitterness or skepticism or into a thinking that God is not on our side, which,
candidly, is what Dana and I were thinking throughout much of the recurrence
battle. By reminding ourselves of “no elk envy” we stayed out of a dangerous
hole.
From my perspective, the less God’s people freak out over
things not going our way, the more we show an observing world that we trust
God’s ways. The issue of suffering is a big sticking point for those who are
testing the waters of Christianity but have yet to jump in. Our reaction to
suffering, or more poignantly, our reaction to things not going our way,
displays whether or not we believe what Scripture says about suffering,
chiefly, that we will experience it. And it displays whether or not we believe,
and even appreciate, God’s fail-safe promise that He will be with us in the
suffering.
To train myself to think and pray this way, I may adopt a
new phrase for the close of my prayers, “No elk envy.” It may not be as poetic
as “Amen,” but it forces me to think “Your will be done” and actually mean it.
Thank you for observing this journey with me.
Barry
Follow-Up Note: My
mom’s follow-up tests all went well and things seem to be okay with her heart.
Also, I received a note from Randy and Kay saying that Ben’s first elk hunting excursion
this season was unproductive, adding a little more credence to last season’s
divinely-timed, God-stamped elk.
Bible Follow-Up: In taking the observations of this
journey to a next level, I've created a bare-bones Bible experience to
accompany this post. It's an opportunity to explore, and even evaluate, some of
my biblical assertions. You can get it here. (By the way, we need a new
word for "devotional" or "Bible study." Right now
"experience" is all I got, but I know we can do better.)